Thursday, April 24, 2008

Spring Breakthroughs . . . of Last Year – March 6-10, 2007

I owe everyone e-mails and comments on their blogs and all sorts of other things. But instead I'm just going to post. I've been able to type a few sentences a night, and this is what I've got, so here it is, and I'll be in touch with everyone else soon.


March 6



41



When a superior man hears of the Tao,



He immediately begins to embody it.



When an average man hears of the Tao,



He half believes it, half doubts it.



When a foolish man hears of the Tao,



He laughs out loud.



If he didn't laugh,



It wouldn't be the Tao.




Well, I'm not completely foolish, but neither am I superior. I hate being average, but that is part of the Tao's message to me, to be content being average, "rough and common as a stone." I try to immediately embody the Tao, but maybe because of my lingering doubt, I'm unable to do so completely. Yesterday's message hit on the part I'm most doubtful about – that the world is exactly as it should be, that humans should be like sheep. Will keep working on that.





Thus it is said:



The path into the light seems dark,



The path forward seems to go back,



The direct path seems long,



True power seems weak,



True purity seems tarnished,



True steadfastness seems changeable,



True clarity seems obscure,



The greatest art seems unsophisticated,



The greates love seems indifferent,



The greatest wisdom seems childish.






The Tao is nowhere to be found.



Yet it nourishes and completes all things.


Maybe my biggest problem is a lack of trust. I cannot let go of my rationality, even when I know it is limited. I can't just let go and trust – either the Buddha or Jesus or the writers of the Upanishads and Gita or Lao-Tzu. I recognize their wisdom. I see that the path they prescribe worked for them. And yet I am unwilling to commit myself to one path and let go. Let go of doubt and shame and cynicism and distrust, and logic. Part of that unwillingness is fear of being wrong. Some fear of being betrayed.


I feel betrayed, still, by Christianity. I gave it my whole heart, several times. And it isn't so much that people disappointed me; one expects humans to be human. It is that the Christian texts themselves confuse and anger and bewilder and bedevil me. They don't make sense. And I don't mean that when you compare them to outside measures they fall short, like that they don't meet a scientific test. No, I mean the texts are internally inconsistent. And I have really tried to allow faith and love to overcome those inconsistencies and off-putting statements, but I am finally at a place where I just cannot believe that the texts are right. There has been too much human interference. I do not get the Jesus of the texts.


So maybe I'm afraid I'll get burnt again, made to feel like a fool for believing, if I let go and commit myself to another tenet.




March 7


I wanted to say something about where I had to end yesterday.


All of the teachings of the East seem more right to me than the teachings of the West. They also seem more approachable, and more testable (by me, I mean – not laboratory tests or logical proofs), so one doesn't have to take a giant leap of faith just to get started. And indeed, I have started down the road they lay out. Maybe more than just started. What keeps holding me back from commitment . . . or rather, what keeps being a sticking place, is the cyclical nature of time. I can't believe, as I've said ad naseum, that we go through all of this just to do it again exactly the same way. I know, I know, the arrogance of me telling the Universe wht it ought to be about.


But it seems to me that it is basic human nature to build toward something, to seek improvement. And yes, I teach students all the time to question whether that is just Western bias; we believe in "progress," and so it must be human nature. I know it is pure bias if you mean people are driven to build a better shampoo or to change their agricultural techniques, even, to increase production. People in rural agricultural societies, and pastoralists, etc., are not driven by a desire for material improvement. Their energy goes much more into maintaining the status quo. So perhaps that is human nature. In terms of the East – rural China and India still have religions and philosophies that offer hope of improvement in some areas, right? Self-improvement, at least? Indian philosphy may not promote economic or political or cultural change, but it definitely promotes the idea that people should spend all of their energy on improving themselves.


There has to be something to work for. Doesn't there? It is when I run into phrases that seem to suggest that no, there is nothing to work toward, nothing to change, all is exactly as it should be – or that the ideal state would be an unchanging one in which people lived just to live – it just seems like it can't be right.


But maybe this is all a big misunderstanding on my part. Maybe it's like yesterday's message – that the right path may seem wrong at first. Perhaps these messages of complacency are the darkness at the start of the path into light. Maybe this is where my path forward appears to go back?


I think it is worth operating on that assumption. Keep following the path to see where it takes me. Because I've already learned that some of the other things on the list are true.


True power, like that of my Mom, seems weak. She looks frail, yet look at what she has withstood! The greatest love seems indifferent. I myself, through loving my friends, seemed indifferent the more I learned to love them enough to not try to control them. To let them make their own mistakes and discoveries and simply love them through it. I know they sometimes saw that as indifference.


Many times I've seen the greatest wisdom seem childish, and true purity tarnished. In anthropological theory, it seems often the case that the greatest clarity looks obscure. So, maybe I need to trust that these wise people are wise, and that I need to move further along the path in trust, in suspended disbelief, and see if the meaning doesn't change for me.


So now I'm ready for today's lesson and it is already 8 am!



42



The Tao gives birth to One.



One gives birth to Two.



Two gives birth to three.



Three gives birth to all things.






All things have their back to the female



And stand facing the male.



When male and female combine,



All things achieve harmony.






Ordinary men hate solitude.



But the Master makes use of it,



Embracing her aloneness, realizing



She is One with the whole universe.




At first I thought this one was going to be too mystical to be relevant to me right now. But then I remembered to interpret male and female as yin and yang. Then a whole world of meaning opened up, and maybe is directly relevant to the previous discussion. Recall that in Chinese symbolism, male=power, aggression, change, progress, violence, rationality. Female=power (quiet, hidden power), passivity, receptivity, stillness, sameness, peace and positive emotions.


So, if this starts in the beginning – the Tao is beyond duality, but go further – the Tao is even beyond "oneness" Whoa, dude! When the Tao gives birth to One, and One to Two, then out of duality springs an abundance of diversity. But keep in mind it is all really One. This in turn is part of the Tao.


But when "born" into this unvierse, all things are facing the male – change, linearity, action, aggression. All the stuff I'm worried about. Maybe we focus on that, because it is what is before us. The important point for me is that it isn't either/or. Yes, all of that stuff I crave is in front of me – progress! Behind me, though, supporting me, is the female – the calm stillness, etc. Important because they are both needed. Don't forget that the female is there, since I can't see it. That may be the message for me.


Further, one doesn't have to choose between them – it is when they come together that I, and the world, are in harmony.


I'm not sure I'm saying all of this right, but I get it! It's a breakthrough moment. And then the reminder at the end that all us little "ones," all the diverse beings don't need to scramble around trying to "connect" with one another. Just sit back and remember we are One. Already. No effort needed.


I think this was really helpful today. I feel like I'll be able to move ahead more smoothly.


March 8


I'm all for "early to bed, early to rise," but this three hours a night is getting ridiculous.



43



The gentlest thing in the world



Overcomes the hardest thing in the world.



That which has no substance



Enters where there is no space.



This shows the value of non-action.






Teaching without words,



Performing without actions;



That is the Master's way.




Some of this I get – wind and water overcome rock. Hmm, maybe my newish insight that I need to be gentle and nice to my body, that it will be more effective than force and meanness also fits here. I'm not sure about the next part. That which has no substance – the Tao? Wisdom? Love? Enters where there is no space. No space created for it? No space between things you've tightly organized? Or like this – love, Tao, etc., enters even through a defensive wall that has no cracks? It succeeds where arrows or battering rams would fail. That at least makes sense. But I keep seeing the epidural space, which I have no time to explain. [the epidural space is the space in the spine which the doctor/anesthesiologist has to "feel" for when giving one an epidural. They punch through the skin with the long needle and kind of poke around inbetween the vertebrae, and as my doc explained it, one just develops a sense of when one has hit it by the absence of pressure, a sort of "give."]


All references to teaching interest me. How can I better my teaching through non-action? Allow time for students to think? Don't fill every moment? Those are true, but maybe I can get to a deeper meaning by thinking on it all day, behind the other work.


March 9



44



Fame or integrity; which is more important?



Money or happiness; which is more valuable?



Success or failure; which is more destructive?






If you look to others for fulfillment,



You will never be truly fulfilled.



If your happiness depends on money,



You will never be happy with yourself.






Be content with what you have;



Rejoice in the way things are.



When you realize there is nothing lacking,



The whole world belongs to you.


A good reminder of all the stuff I've been working on. Rejoicing in the way things are! I am really trying to. Maybe I need to say it more often. Inside, I believe it occassionally. The two hardest things to rejoice about are my pain and Jim's unemployment. It is really hard to tell myself that there is nothing lacking when Jim so desperately feels the void. Is this the work we need to do? Accept it at least as temporary? And my pain, I'm getting cloer to stopping hoping for a cure.


March 10


[Long evaluation of pain level and whether certain treatments had worked, getting ready for upcoming epidural and relating discussion with husband about mental control of emotional and physical states].


I believe we can be in that much control. We have to learn how. That is part of what I'm working so hard on. How do I control my response? I can't change the fact of the pain, but I'm trying hard to learn to control how I feel about it. This brings me back to my day. I met with P (my pain psychologist). We eventually got to talking about self-hypnosis and she gave me a CD to get me started, since I can't afford the ones she recommended. Her voice was out of whack, so she couldn't lead me in one, either. But we talked more about how I should do it.


I told her part of what was holding me back was my fear – fear of not doing it right. I'm afraid I won't follow the directions, afraid I won't really let go of my awake mind, afraid that I won't know if I'm in trance or not, afraid I'll either convince myself I am when I'm not, or vice vera, and either way will miss my chance. She put me at ease. Gave me very specific instructions to follow that included what to say to myself, and made it clear that it is going to take practice. It won't happen right away, probably. But once I learn the basic technique of entering trance, then I'll be able to do more complicated things.


One really great thing she said was, "You can't be worried about performance issues. How can you do this wrong? You don't even know what right is, for you. We are all different. Some have a sensation of going up. Others down. Some get heavy, some get light. Some are silent, others speak. Some are still, others move around. Some feel sure they never reached a trance state; until they come back up, and realize it is a long journey back. You are on a journey of exploration," she said. "Go on and enjoy it, go find out who you are. There is a whole other part of you to get to know. Just trust yourself and go."


That was so freeing! To be given permission to just explore – it doesn't have to be a certain way. It isn't something one has to do "just so." And I think that I have been held back from meditation because of this, because I was afraid of not doing it "right." That is why I wanted a yogi, a teacher. So this is another thing I'm excited about. Two things – using the CD and doing it by myself. There will be issue of making time and finding a quiet space, but I think Jim will work with me.



45



True perfection seems imperfect



Yet it is perfectly itself.



True fullness seems empty,



Yet it is fully present.






True straightness seems crooked,



True wisdome seems foolish.



True art seems artless.






The Master allows things to happen.



She shapes events as they come.



She steps out of the way,



And lets the Tao speak for itself.


Things are not as they seem. Perhaps my attempts to go into trance, that seemed very disorganzied and undisciplined, were exactly, perfectly, what they were supposed to be. When I interview people, I can get into that zone, that place of being fully present to the person I'm interviewing, and utterly empty of myself. Sometimes the wisest thing one can do is walk in the rain with no umbrella, dive headfirst into a problem without looking – all which may seem foolish. Remember this! Remember it when criticizing Jim, or when confronted with a difficult-to-understand student. Things and people are not what they seem.


I've understood (if not always remembered) to let things happen, to accept the world as it unfolds. But how does one "allow" in that way while simultaneously "shaping events as they come"? Another paradox. Could it be like when you decide not to react, you shape the way an argument goes?


P told me yesterday she uses Tarot cards as a meditation tool. One day she pulled the ten of spades, which is the one where a man is lying face down with spears penetrating his whole body. And she thought, "Yes! This is exactly how work, the office, makes me feel!" We were talking about choice. Because if she used the deck as a fortune-telling tool, a prediction, she could say "Yep, this is how my day is going to go." And go into the office with that attitude, and of course that is the way the day would go. But what she did was use the Tarot to help her see her choices. And when she got to the office door, she realized she could choose not to be pierced with spears. And she decided to be nice to everyone, stay out of the cliques, go into her office, do her work, stay out of the conflicts, and lo and behold, her experiences at work got much better.


So is this the kind of shaping he means? And this story also illustrates the getting out of the way to let the Tao reveal itself. It hink I get it. Now to do it. Now I really want to go get one of my decks and use it the same way. If not every day, occasionally. Oh dear, another way to put off work. Tell you what – I'll use it as a reward.

Tuesday, April 15, 2008

March 2-5, 2007

You will of course notice the new look. I visited my brother-in-law's blog a couple weeks ago and realized he used the same template, and we can't have that, can we? So for now, this is what this blog will look like. I am a sucker for personalizing the way things look, and changing them around frequently (which is why I am loving Vista, even if it is supposed to crash more often – which it hasn't yet), so you can probably expect this to happen again. It probably reflects a character flaw, but I do not claim any sort of perfection.

I am sorry it has been so long. I have been so crazy – usual end of semester madness beginning, coupled with lots of presentations and trips and a nephew's visit. All good blogging topics, which is why I want to get this old stuff out of the way.

I guess there is no law that says I have to post all the old before I can say anything new, but we are so close now, just a year and a month away . . .

March 2

35

She who is centered in the Tao

Can go where she wishes, without danger

She perceives the universal harmony,

Even amid great pain

Because she has found peace in her heart.


Music or the smell of good cooking

May make people stop and enjoy

But words that point to the Tao

Seem monotonous and without flavor

When you look for it, there is nothing to see.

When you listen for it, there is nothing to hear.

When you use it, it is inexhaustible.

The last part I get. It is like the broad and narrow paths of Jesus' description. The first part I get intellectually, but it's the same old thing, how does one get to that place? I'm working hard on perceiving the universal harmony amid my pain, but it is hard. Seeing any harmony at all amid Jim's pain, or the suffering of the world, is near impossible.

I can intellectually grasp the need for the purpose of suffering in the world. I get it, about growth and bravery, etc. But when faced with the horrible brutality of life, when reading about hungry and abused children, or watching Jim ache with desire for meaningful work, it feels immoral to take a position that their pain is okay because it serves some greater purpose. Especially if the purpose is one the sufferer will never see, or benefit from personally.

I think the Buddha could pull it off through his great compassion. While seeing the purpose of pain, and how it fit in to the big picture, he could at the same time empathize completely, could feel the other's pain with them, which somehow lessens the burden. I can practice with my husband. Instead of becoming enraged that he is not getting what he deserves, which causes me pain – a lot of it – and then withdrawing in frustration and helplessness, I should empathize. Allow him to feel what he feels, extend to him my deepest compassion, and just let it be. Try to absorb some of his pain by sharing it, and then let it go. Let it be taken by the current of the Tao and dissolved there. I will try. And I need to get my butt meditating every day, even if it means getting up even earlier.


March 3

36

If you want to shrink something

You must first allow it to expand.

If you want to get rid of something

You must firs allow it to flourish

If you want to take something,

You must first allow it to be given

This is called the subtle perception

Of the way things are.


The soft overcomes the hard.

The slow overcomes the fast.

Let your workings remain a mystery.

Just show people the result.

Wow. Once again, there is so much here that is useful. If I want to shrink and get rid of the pain, I have to first allow it to grow and flourish. I know this instinctively. It is what I mean when I say that I need to just lie down somewhere quiet and let the pain be itself. Most of every day I am "on" and all that time, around others, I'm fighting and repressing the pain, squishing it down. That doesn't make it go away though. When I take a time out, and let the pain swell and take over my whole consciousness – just let it be there, what it is, and FEEL it, without fighting it, eventually it subsides on its own, and no longer needs to take up my whole mind.

Can I use this knowledge to control the pain? Can I schedule more breaks into the day, more moments where the pain gets its way, gets to be huge? Maybe then it will fit more neatly into the box I'm always trying to squish it into the rest of the time? Certainly worth a try.

There is so much more I could explore here, even with just the first stanza. What other things in my personality or habits would this work on? Will keep thinking about it, but right now I have to get to work.


March 4

37

The Tao never does anything,

Yet through it all things are done.


If powerful men and women

Could center themselves in it

The whole world would be transformed

By itself, in its natural rhythms.

People would be content

With their simple, every day lives,

In harmony, and free of desire.


When there is no desire,

All things are at peace.

It is truly amazing how much the Buddha and Lao-tzu sound alike. They lived at the same time, but separated by a huge distance. And there is much that is different. Still, how is it that two of the world's greatest religions – three if you count Hinduism, mother of Buddhism – would come to the same conclusions. And many of our Western philosophers and mystics join their ranks. It must be true, right? There is something very attractive about having all the world living their contented lives, in peace, with no desire. But only for a minute. Then I ask myself what makes us better, or different from animals? Lao-Tzu may have thought, in his wisdom, that we aren't anything special; we are just another species, and the point of life is just to live.

Sometimes I agree with him. Our big brains were just an accident, and there is nothing more, so we should just live our lives and enjoy them, because that's it. But I am too much a child of the West to really buy that. There has to be more. Maybe it isn't about using our hands to make technology, maybe it is achieving something mental/psychological/spiritual. But there has to be something worth working for!

38

The Master doesn't try to be powerful;

Thus she is truly powerful.

The ordinary man keeps reaching for power,

Thus he never has enough.

I keep reading the stanzas about power, and I often kind of glaze over, because I'm thinking about rulers, provosts, etc. but how does this apply to me? In what ways do I seek power for myself? The anthro department, in arguments with my spouse, getting control of my father's behavior. Maybe some other areas. Lao-tzu isn't saying power is wrong to have, It just shouldn't be desired. Our desire, what we want, should be focused on other things, like doing the job right, or being a good wife, and a good daughter. If power comes your way because you done a good job, you need to stay focused on the job, and not be distracted, attracted, seduced, overcome, or lazy because of the power. With personal relationships, we need . . . I need . . . to let go of the desire to control. Period.

The Master does nothing,

Yet she leaves nothing undone.

The ordinary man is always doing things,

Yet many more are left to be done.

There is a lesson here I really need to learn. Man, I am really having a hard time keeping my eyes open. This is a nasty dizzy druggy feeling. I keep reading and writing through slitted eyes, and I think even going in and out of consciousness. But I don't want to give up because it is my only time for this.

Okay, all the things I feel I have to do. All I leave undone. How do I learn to do nothing at all and yet leave nothing undone? It has to do with doing each task mindfully, not thinking of it as a task or a chore. It is just the next thing. I guess if you can do that all day, at the end all things are done.

I've had tastes of days like this but I need more practice, and some guidance would be nice.

The kind man does something,

Yet something remains undone.

The just man does something,

And leaves many things to be done,

The moral man does something,

And when no one responds,

He rolls up his sleeves and uses force.


When the Tao is lost, there is goodness.

When goodness is lost, there is morality.

When morality is lost, there is ritual.

Ritual is the husk of faith,

The beginning of chaos.


Therefore the Master concerns himself

With the depths and not the surface

With the fruit and not the flower.

He has no will of his own.

He dwells in reality

And lets all illusions go.

Have to bail out for awhile, but the above speaks for itself. The Buddha could have written it.

March 5

39

In harmony with the Tao,

The sky is clear and spacious,

The earth is solid and full,

All creatures flourish together,

Content with the way they are,

Endlessly repeating themselves,

Endlessly universal.


When man interferes with the Tao,

The sky becomes filthy,

The earth becomes depleted,

The equilibrium crumbles,

Creatures become extinct.


The Master views the parts with compassion,

Because he understands the whole.

His/her constant practice is humility.

She doesn't glitter like a jewel

But lets herself be shaped by the Tao,

As rugged and common as a stone.

Blog Rankings

Religion Blogs - Blog Rankings